Evaporative Cooling vs. Air Conditioning

Is evaporative cooling better for the environment?

Back to All FAQs

In most cases, yes—evaporative cooling has a significantly smaller environmental footprint than air conditioning. Here's a detailed comparison:

Energy consumption:

Evaporative coolers use approximately 75% less electricity than comparable air conditioning systems. This translates directly to:

  • Lower carbon emissions from power generation
  • Reduced strain on the electrical grid
  • Less fossil fuel consumption
  • Smaller overall carbon footprint

Refrigerants:

Air conditioners:

  • Use chemical refrigerants (R-410A, R-32, older R-22)
  • Refrigerant leaks contribute to ozone depletion and global warming
  • R-410A has a global warming potential (GWP) 2,088× greater than CO2
  • Proper disposal required at end of life

Evaporative coolers:

  • Use only water—no refrigerants
  • No ozone depletion potential
  • No global warming potential from refrigerants
  • Simple disposal at end of life

Manufacturing impact:

Evaporative coolers have:

  • Simpler construction
  • Fewer manufactured components
  • No compressor or complex refrigerant system
  • Lower embodied energy in materials

Water usage consideration:

The one environmental trade-off is water consumption:

  • Evap coolers use 3-15 gallons per hour
  • In water-scarce desert regions, this is a valid concern
  • However, much of this water evaporates into the atmosphere (natural water cycle)
  • Power plants that generate electricity for AC also use significant water

Carbon footprint comparison:

Running a central AC for one summer month produces approximately:

  • 600-1,200 lbs of CO2 (depending on local grid)

Running an evaporative cooler for one summer month produces:

  • 100-200 lbs of CO2

The bottom line:

For appropriate climates, evaporative cooling is substantially more environmentally friendly:

  • 75% less electricity = 75% less power plant emissions
  • No harmful refrigerants
  • Simpler manufacturing
  • The water usage trade-off is generally favorable compared to electricity impact

If you live in a dry climate where evaporative cooling is effective, choosing it over AC is one of the most impactful environmental choices you can make for home cooling.

Environmental comparison infographic - evaporative coolers use 75% less electricity, no refrigerants, lower carbon footprint vs air conditioning
The Environmental Impact: Evaporative Cooler vs Air Conditioning

Need Professional Help?

Find a qualified swamp cooler specialist in your area for installation, maintenance, or repairs.

Find Local Pros